3D Detector Activities: Difference between revisions
From ift
No edit summary |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Who are we? == | == Who are we? == | ||
* In Bergen: Bjarne, Heidi, | * In Bergen: Bjarne, Heidi, ... | ||
== Documentation == | |||
[http://web.ift.uib.no/~dominik/files/detectorlabwiki/3d/3D%20report%2006-03-09.pdf 3D Report Cedric Virmontois]<br> | |||
[http://web.ift.uib.no/~dominik/files/detectorlabwiki/3d/Masteroppgave_kristine_helle.pdf Master thesis Kristine Helle] | |||
==Acknowledgements== | ==Acknowledgements== | ||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 19 January 2011
Introduction to 3D detectors
3D detectors have three dimensional electrods going through the silicon substrate. The depletion thickness depends on p+ and n+ electrode distance. The advantages with 3D technology is:
- It can operate at very low voltages
- One can achieve very high radiation hardness
- Very fast
- Active almost to the edge
Schematic drawings of the 3D detector:
More information
- Testbeam talk by Erlend and Ole
- 3D workshop in Barcelona
- 3D-state of the art
- 3D proposal by S.I. Parker C.J. Kenneyand and J. Segal (NIMA395(1997)328)]
- The home of TurboDAQ
Our Activities
- TestBeam Analysis
- 3DSensor Characteristics
- 3DMeasurement System
(Rather) Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions FAQ
Who are we?
- In Bergen: Bjarne, Heidi, ...
Documentation
3D Report Cedric Virmontois
Master thesis Kristine Helle
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Alessandro de la Rosa and Ole Rohne for the lots of help we received from them, and to Cedric Virmontois who made work on 3D in Bergen.
